New AI-assisted FMEA and verification campaigns

Requirements management that engineers actually want to open

The verification and review depth of Jama or Polarion, at the price of ReqView — hosted in the EU, with the AI the incumbents charge extra for. Built for hardware teams too small for DOORS and too serious for a spreadsheet.

No card · All modules and AI in the trial · EU-hosted · Set up by hand, usually within a working day
Reqlio dashboard — Pyra-1 Wildfire Sentinel UAS: KPIs, requirements trend, verification status and open reviews
UAV & aerospaceSpaceRobotics
Why Reqlio

Five things the incumbents won't give you

Deep where it matters

Not a requirements list with a traceability column. Verification activities with runs and coverage, campaigns, gates with readiness, risk register, FMEA, interfaces, technical budgets — the stack a small hardware team otherwise pays Jama or Valispace for.

AI in every module, included

INCOSE-style quality scoring with rewrites, decomposition, conflict detection, verification suggestions, risk and FMEA assistance, a project chat that cites requirement IDs — and an MCP server so Claude or any agent can work in your project. Bundled, with a generous monthly allowance.

Reviewers are free

Pay for the people who write. Approvers, stakeholders, viewers and supplier portal guests cost nothing, without limit. Sign-off is not a seat.

EU-hosted, your own database

Servers in Germany, one PostgreSQL database per customer, data never leaves the EU by default. On Business, AI runs on an EU model endpoint of your choice.

Honest and simple

Public prices. Thirty-day full trial without a card. Exports always available — ReqIF, XLSX, CSV. Read-only access to your data after cancellation. A continuity statement instead of a sales deck.

Everything in one place

The whole systems engineering process.
Not just a requirements list.

Excel can hold requirements. DOORS can hold budgets hostage. Reqlio gives small and mid-size hardware teams the full process — connected, current and reviewable.

Specifications & requirements

ECSS-style document tree — stakeholder to component level — with sections, rationale, acceptance criteria and full history.

Traceability

Derivation matrix, trace explorer and gap detection. Export a real RTM. Suspect links flag anything touched by change.

Verification & campaigns

Test, analysis, inspection and review of design — planned on Kanban and timeline, grouped into campaigns that feed gates.

Risk & FMEA

A 5×5 risk register plus AIAG-VDA FMEA worksheets — failure modes escalate to risks, mitigations trace to requirements.

Reviews, gates & baselines

Findings with dispositions, approval workflows that actually move requirement status, milestone gates and frozen baselines.

Collaboration built in

Comments with mentions, a personal inbox of everything awaiting you, meetings with action items — no email archaeology.

The V-model, connected

Define. Trace. Verify. Baseline.

Every artifact links to the next, so status rolls up instead of living in someone's spreadsheet. Change one requirement and Reqlio flags everything downstream for re-review.

Level 0

Stakeholder needs

Captured in the StRD, AI-quality-checked

Level 1

System requirements

The SRD — derived & reviewed

Level 2

Subsystem specs

Design specs with FMEA per scope

Build

Implementation

Your design & code — outside Reqlio

Level 2

Subsystem verification

Test · analysis · inspection · RoD

Level 1

System verification

Campaigns, reviews & gates

Level 0

Acceptance & baseline

Validated, frozen per milestone

01 · Define

Write good requirements

Structured specs with AI quality checks against INCOSE writing rules — ambiguity, missing criteria, duplicates.

02 · Trace

Link every level

Stakeholder → system → subsystem derivation, risks mitigated by requirements, gaps surfaced automatically.

03 · Verify

Prove it works

Four ECSS methods, campaign planning, and verification status derived live from evidence — never hand-set.

04 · Baseline

Freeze & gate

Reviews close the loop, gates collect the evidence, baselines snapshot the agreed state for each milestone.

Requirements — grouped by spec, two-axis status: approval and verification.
Requirements — grouped by spec, two-axis status: approval and verification.
Traceability — derivation matrix, trace explorer and health checks.
Traceability — derivation matrix, trace explorer and health checks.
Verification — coverage matrix across test, analysis, inspection and review of design.
Verification — coverage matrix across test, analysis, inspection and review of design.
Risks — 5×5 exposure matrix with mitigation traceability into requirements.
Risks — 5×5 exposure matrix with mitigation traceability into requirements.
FMEA — AIAG-VDA worksheets with action priority, escalating into the risk register.
FMEA — AIAG-VDA worksheets with action priority, escalating into the risk register.
V-model — live verification status plotted on the V, from stakeholder needs to acceptance.
V-model — live verification status plotted on the V, from stakeholder needs to acceptance.
AI where it earns its keep

An assistant that speaks fluent SE

Not a chatbot bolted on — AI actions embedded in each module, running as background jobs while you keep working.

Quality

Requirement quality review

Scans statements against INCOSE rules: ambiguous quantifiers, missing acceptance criteria, compound requirements — with suggested rewrites.

Decomposition

Decompose & suggest links

Splits high-level requirements into testable children and proposes trace links you approve one by one.

Verification

Suggest methods & activities

Recommends test vs analysis vs inspection per requirement, drafts activities for uncovered ones.

Risk

Identify risks

Reads your spec and surfaces implied risks with severity estimates — reviewed and accepted by you, never silently added.

FMEA

Draft failure modes

Proposes failure modes, effects and causes per function, pre-scored for the AIAG-VDA action priority table.

Glossary

Extract terminology

Builds your acronym and definition glossary from the requirement corpus, auto-highlighted in every statement.

Standards-native

Built on the practices your auditors already trust

Reqlio's data model isn't invented — it's lifted from the standards systems engineers already work to, so your process maps one-to-one.

ECSS-E-ST-10-06

Specification tree — technical requirements specifications by decomposition level, with rationale and acceptance criteria per requirement.

ECSS-E-ST-10-02

Four verification methods — test, analysis, inspection, review of design — with evidence-derived closure.

INCOSE GtWR

Writing-rule quality checks — the AI review enforces the INCOSE Guide to Writing Requirements characteristics.

AIAG-VDA

FMEA with Action Priority — S/O/D scoring and the official AP table, escalating into the programme risk register.

ISO 31000

Risk lifecycle — identify, assess, treat, verify, monitor, accept — with initial vs residual exposure.

Pricing

Priced for teams, not procurement departments

Public prices, in euros, excluding VAT. Pay for the people who write — everyone who reviews, approves or reads is free, without limit.

Team

€59 / editor / month
Billed annually, 3-editor minimum · €69 monthly, 2-editor minimum
  • Unlimited free reviewers, approvers, viewers & portal guests
  • All modules — requirements to budgets
  • AI included: 300 actions per editor / month, then economy mode
  • Google & Microsoft sign-in, domain-restricted
  • ReqIF, XLSX, CSV import & export · audit trail
  • EU-hosted, your own database
Request access
For regulated teams

Business

€99 / editor / month
Billed annually, 5-editor minimum · €119 monthly
  • Everything in Team
  • Deep AI tier, 2.5× allowance — or bring your own EU model endpoint for unlimited AI
  • Validation pack, DPA, security questionnaire answered
  • SAML sign-in (planned)
  • Priority support, one business day, onboarding session
Request access

Enterprise

From €15k / year
For larger organisations with IT requirements
  • Everything in Business
  • Private model endpoint · custom retention
  • Dedicated instance or self-hosted
  • Source-code escrow · SLA with credits
  • Named contact · migration from DOORS, Polarion or Jama as a fixed-price project
Talk to us

Effective cost: four editors plus ten free stakeholders ≈ €17 per user per month. No free tier — a deliberate choice, so your vendor is still here next year.

30-day full trial

Work email, no card. All modules, all AI. At day 30 the workspace goes read-only — not deleted — for another 60 days.

Founding customers

The first ten get Business features at the Team price, locked for as long as they stay.

Startups

50% off the first year for companies under two years old or under €2M raised.

Paid pilot

€1,500 for 90 days for regulated teams — onboarding and one migration included, fully credited against the first annual contract.

Where that sits in the market

Published per-editor prices, normalised to one editor / month on annual billing.

Flow Pro$300
IBM DOORS Next$164
Codebeamer$150
Polarion (est.)$149
Reqlio Business€99
Perforce ALM$89
Valispace$83
Reqlio Team€59
ReqView Team€50
FAQ

Questions engineers actually ask

What counts as an editor?

Anyone who creates or edits requirements, specs, activities, risks, FMEA rows or budgets, logs test runs, runs AI actions, or manages baselines and reviews. Reviewers — people who read, comment, vote and approve or request changes on review steps — are free, as are viewers and supplier portal guests. Sign-off is not a seat.

What happens after the 30-day trial?

Your workspace goes read-only, not deleted, for another 60 days. Exports (ReqIF, XLSX, CSV) stay available the whole time. Pick a plan whenever you're ready; nothing is lost in between.

Can we get our data out?

Always. ReqIF, XLSX and CSV export are available on every plan, at any time — including after cancellation, when you keep read-only access to your data for twelve months. On Enterprise, source-code escrow is available.

Where is our data, and what does the AI see?

Hosted in Frankfurt, Germany, by creoline GmbH (ISO/IEC 27001:2022, TÜV SÜD) in firstcolo’s FRA4 data centre (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 with data-centre operation in scope, TÜV-certified data centre level 3), with one PostgreSQL database per customer. Data does not leave the EU by default. No model is trained on your data. The model provider keeps prompts briefly for abuse monitoring — 30 days on the default Anthropic models, up to 55 if you switch a project to Google’s. On Business you can bring your own EU model endpoint, so requirement text reaches neither.

How is this different from DOORS or Polarion?

Same concepts auditors expect — specification trees, four verification methods, baselines, RTMs, formal reviews — without months of configuration, a sales call to learn the price, or AI sold as a paid add-on. And the people who approve don't need a licence.

Who is behind Reqlio?

One engineer — German, based in the Netherlands, with a background in the aerospace industry — building the tool the incumbents refuse to. The verification campaigns, gates and budgets exist because they were missed on real programmes, not imagined in a product workshop. And that's why there's a written continuity statement instead of a sales deck: exports always on, read-only access after cancellation, escrow on Enterprise. Your data is never hostage to anyone's roadmap — including ours.

Start now

Stop managing requirements in Excel.
Start engineering them.

30-day full trial — every module, every AI action, no card. We set each workspace up by hand, usually within one working day — or book a 30-minute walkthrough first.

We use your address only to reply and set up access (privacy) · No card · Read-only, not deleted, after day 30 · EU-hosted · Exports always available